|
ASIJ
Outcomes |
Standard |
6
or 7 points |
4
or 5 points |
2
or 3 points |
0-1
points |
|
Reading
/ Writing |
Writing and Grammar |
Your
writing is clear, creative and effective with no grammatical
errors. Your sentences are natural and smooth and exhibit correct
usage. |
Your paper
is well written, with few grammatical errors. Your sentences are
natural and exhibit mostly correct usage
|
Your
paper is written with some grammatical errors. Some sentences are
awkward and exhibit poor usage.
|
Your paper has many
grammatical errors and is difficult to understand Sentences
exhibit many errors in usage and there are misspelled and misused
words throughout.
|
|
Reading
/ Writing |
Structure
and Required Elements
Written in the first
person
Double-spaced
One line between
paragraphs
5-7 pages long, not
including references
Components of the
paper
|
Your paper is extremely well organized.
It is written in the first person and includes all the
required elements.
|
Your paper is organized.
It is written in the first person and includes all of the required elements.
|
Your paper is not well
organized. It is not written in the first person. It has some
of the required elements. |
Your paper lacks a clear
structure. It is not written in the first person and is missing most of
the required elements.
|
|
Information
Literacy
|
Research/Resources
 | At least five
references of different types |
 | At least one interview
with an expert -or equivalent
(see Mrs. Hayakawa) |
 | Search log turned in
with paper |
|
Your research was very
carefully done. Your search log is extremely detailed. You used
six or more
resources of different types. You conducted two or more high quality
interviews with experts.
|
Your research was well done.
Your search log is well detailed. You used at least five resources
of different types and conducted one good interview with an
expert.
|
Your research was not very well done.
Your search log has some
detail. You used at least four resources of different
types. One interview was conducted. |
You did little research.
Your search log has little detail. Fewer than four resources
were used. No interviews were conducted.
|
|
Information
Literacy |
Question |
Your
question is well thought out and clearly defined. It is neither too broad nor too narrow.
|
Your question is good, but a little too vague, broad or narrow. |
Your question is difficult
to answer because it is either too vague, too broad or too narrow. |
Your question is either extremely vague, broad or narrow. It cannot be
answered in an I-Search project. |
|
Information
Literacy |
Search
Process
|
Your
search process is well documented in 3-5 pages and includes dead
ends. |
Your search process is
documented in some detail in 2-3 pages
|
Your search process is documented in
fewer than 2 pages. |
Your
search process is not clearly documented. |
|
Information
Literacy/ Technology |
Presentation - Content |
Your
presentation was engaging, effective, and visually interesting. It
incorporated technology and covered all five sections of the paper. |
Your
presentation was well designed and interesting. It incorporated technology and
covered all five sections of
the paper. |
Your presentation
was difficult to
understand. It incorporated technology
and covered some of the five sections of the paper. |
Your presentation was
poorly designed. It did not incorporate technology and did not cover
the content of the paper. |
|
Listening/Speaking/ |
Presentation - Delivery |
Your delivery was very clear. You maintained eye contact with
audience. |
Your
delivery was clear. You maintained eye contact most of
the time. |
Your voice could not be heard by all members of the
audience. You mispronounced words and rarely made eye
contact. |
You mumbled, mispronounced words,
and did not make eye contact. |
Listening/Speaking/
Reading
/ Writing |
Effort
and Creativity |
Your paper and presentation
showed evidence of great effort and creativity. |
Your paper and presentation
showed evidence of good effort and creativity. |
Your paper and presentation
showed evidence of some effort and creativity. |
Your paper and presentation
showed evidence of little effort and creativity. |